This week I will present to you three examples of violation of the right of petition only from the Malatya Provincial Directorate of Euphrates Electricity Distribution Customer Service Center, the evaluation is left to our readers to reason.
1.One of the electricity subscribers in Malatya due to an incorrect application in the invoice; In accordance with Petition Law no. 3071, he prepared his petition; on 18.09.2012, the relevant company did not respond to the subscriber's petition until 28.01.2013! On 28.01.2013, the subscriber subscribed to a new petition and the relevant distribution company on the same issue; He has re-applied to the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources and the EPDK (Energy Market Regulatory Board) and has not received any explanation from any institution to this day.
2.Although another Electricity Subscriber applied to the company regarding the petition on 02.10.2012 about an application he was subjected to; on January 3, 2013, epdk (Energy Market Regulatory Authority) with documents, although he renewed a new petition on the same issue on 10.12.2012 and a request for information about the fate of his old petition and the transaction. On 21.01.2013, although bimer (Prime Minister's Information Access Center) renewed its application on the Internet, thank fully no institution has bothered to take care of it yet.
When the subscriber asked the relevant company about the fate of his petitions orally on 14.02.2013, he was verbally told by the company that his petition had not been accepted.
3.Another subscriber has applied to the relevant company in writing on 17.01.2013; although he asked for information about the start of enforcement follow-up in 2012 due to a debt from 2009 that has never been not noted to him and has not been seen on any current statement or invoice to this day; When he is not answered until 08.02.2013, when he wants to re-apply to the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, EPDK and related company, the company concerned tells us that you do not owe us electricity and they give the subscriber a debt-free current statement and they do not accept his petition! But they have no attempt to stop the enforcement action against him.
Firat Electricity Distribution Customer Service Center – Leaving Customers Unanswered
There may be doubts about the issues mentioned in this article, i have the original, date and number information of all documents, as well;
I can send it to anyone who wants four of the five deputies of the Ruling Party (including one of the head of the energy commission), including all interviews, statements and open session documents in the local, written and visual press, indicating the practices of the company in question and the size of the victimization of consumers.
Now I'd like to ask the authorities here;
What does the Petition and Information Acquisition Act no. 3071, the relevant articles of the Electricity Market Customer Service Regulation and the Prime Minister's Circular and Criminal Procedure Procedure Law on the Use of Petitions and Information Rights No. 2004/12 do? The sanctions of these Laws and Circulars apply only to certain sections, some of which are exempt from these sanctions?
Is the purpose of the statements of four out of five members of the ruling party about the company to get the consumer's gas? Or do they really lack the power to enforce the law on this company, and if so, which nation are they acting in?
Of course, I think the Malatyals will listen to the advice of their chosen, and their great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great- But in the after all, I think that the method that Deputy Prime Minister Mr. Bulent Arinc would resort to if he was tortured would not fit with the Malatyans!
We continue to believe that any injustice will be improved by law and that no one is above the law.
Twitter : https://twitter.com/tezel_c