Competitive Factors in the Electricity Sector; The tender costs in the privatization of distribution companies are the product of long studies examined by the experts of the companies and detailed analyses were made, within the framework of these analyses, final bids were formed in the first bids and auctions in the tender process.
Nevertheless, many companies that obtained the right to operate by winning the tenders in the last group withret the tender process without performing the transfer at the expense of burning their guarantees.
Of course, it is not our purpose or duty to think, express ideas and comment on behalf of companies here, our aim is simply to share with you a projection from our own perspective on the future of the sector.
Epdk (Energy Market Regulatory Board) revised as 2015 instead of 2013 free consumer annual consumption limits with the reset of the competition from this date onwards means that the competition will be fully formed.
That's when companies with distribution licenses will lose their largely retained monopoly position in their positions and have to fight in a more competitive environment.
On the one hand, i'm going to have Even if the company that owns the distribution license and operates a distribution zone has its own electricity generation, which is not already the necessary strategy, they will be severely thricuted in terms of competition, a fact that will most affect the company's trading volume.
To continue its activities as a strong and competitive company;
Competitiveness and efficiency are important.
The factors of competition are;
Competitive Factors in the Electricity Sector
Consumer awareness
Suppliers
The position of the licensee distribution company,
Price policies
Autoproductor companies
500 kV six unlicensed manufacturers
Control
Diversity in production if the distribution company has production.
Although some of these factors are open to development against the will of the distribution company, they will be active in the customer satisfaction process, especially in the task area of the distribution licensed company, if the distribution company creates its own strategies taking into account other parameters they may be able to turn in favor of situations that appear to be against them.
On the other hand, i'm going to have
Epdk's distribution companies in the table below need a smart grid method using the best possible technologies in today's conditions in order to meet the lost leakage targets between 2011 and 2015, otherwise the loss/leak rates seen in the table below are quite ambitious considering the network loss of between 6 and 8% even in developed countries today.Even if the targeted rates are reached, it is not easy to maintain the rates reached.
Electricity Distribution Companies Lost Fugitive Targets
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
| Dicle | 60.96 % | 50.63 % | 42.06 % | 34.93 % | 29.01 % |
| VANLAKE | 46.15 % | 38.33 % | 31.84 % | 26.45 % | 21.97 % |
| Ahmed | 22.92 % | 19.04 % | 17.62 % | 16.30 % | 15.08 % |
| Chua | 10.90 % | 10.39 % | 10.15 % | 10.15 % | 10.15 % |
| FIRAT | 12.59 % | 11.65 % | 11.11 % | 10.59 % | 10.09 % |
| Canon | 7.72 % | 7.36 % | 7.02 % | 6.92 % | 6.92 % |
| Taurus | 9.38 % | 8.94 % | 8.52 % | 8.12 % | 7.74 % |
| Meram | 8.59 % | 8.28 % | 8.28 % | 8.28 % | 8.28 % |
| Capital | 8.46 % | 8.07 % | 7.88 % | 7.88 % | 7.88 % |
| Mediterranean | 8.86 % | 8.45 % | 8.05 % | 8.02 % | 8.02 % |
| G | 8.48 % | 8.08 % | 7.70 % | 7.34 % | 7.00 % |
| Uludag | 6.96 % | 6.90 % | 6.90 % | 6.90 % | 6.90 % |
| Thrace | 7.70 % | 7.70 % | 7.70 % | 7.70 % | 7.70 % |
| AYEDAS | 7.12 % | 6.79 % | 6.61 % | 6.61 % | 6.61 % |
| SEDAS | 7.66 % | 7.31 % | 6.96 % | 6.64 % | 6.33 % |
| Osmangazi | 7.21 % | 7.21 % | 7.21 % | 7.21 % | 7.21 % |
| Bogazici | 9.12 % | 8.69 % | 8.28 % | 7.90 % | 7.57 % |
| Kayseri | 10.01 % | 10.01 % | 10.01 % | 10.01 % | 10.01 % |
| AYDEM | 9.80 % | 9.34 % | 8.90 % | 8.49 % | 8.09 % |
| Garcia | 10.03 % | 10.03 % | 10.03 % | 10.03 % | 10.03 % |
| Yuan | 10.35 % | 9.87 % | 9.41 % | 8.07 % | 8.78 % |
In addition, I think that the most robust reference year information that the companies that were taken over at the beginning of 2011 will compare their own successes, and the second year after the transfer date are the most accurate reference information.
It seems that companies that can't keep up with the conditions of the day are looking for difficult days in the coming days, and perhaps new mergers or purchases may also come up in the sector.
Coskun Tezel
Leave a Reply